For your convenience, we have installed the link below to make donations to this website easier. Now you can utilize your PayPal account or your credit card.
Click on the logo above to visit the website for Cornell Cooperative Extension of Schuyler County
Guest Column: State Sen. Tom O'Mara
“Redefining the state-local partnership ”
ALBANY, March 7 -- I predicted earlier this year that the current legislative session would provoke strong reactions. Any time you start wading into the kinds of fundamental changes being considered in Albany at the moment, it’s just not going to sit well with everyone.
Among all the changes being thrown into the mix early on, none may have more of an impact on the future of local communities and local taxpayers than the one commonly called “mandate relief.” It’s without question the one that’s become the call to arms among local leaders across the state, and it could turn out to be the crossroads that determines the success of the 2011 session.
So it’s no surprise that last week’s initial report from the “Mandate Relief Redesign Team” appointed by Governor Andrew Cuomo in January is drawing such a strong reaction. This first effort by this team of private- and public-sector leaders to tackle a deep-rooted system of mandates doesn’t go far enough for anyone’s liking. It especially falls well short of offering the specific, short-term actions many are looking for to provide immediate, meaningful relief.
But here’s one thing it does accomplish for now, and it’s something that I think has some value: it keeps building the political pressure that’s going to be needed to force action on the issue. I’ll say this: When’s the last time the issue of mandate relief has received so much focused attention in Albany? Maybe never.
Here’s something else to not overlook. A lot of different people are going to have a lot of different ideas on how best to get at this mandate crisis – politically and practically. The potential strong point of the current strategy is that it’s keeping the stakeholders together in the room, so to speak, until they work it out. The group collectively represents state legislators, mayors, county executives, town superintendents, school administrators and teachers, private-sector employers, public employees, and government reform advocates.
In other words, Governor Cuomo now has a lot riding on meaningful, successful mandate relief, beginning this year. In my view, that means we may have the best shot we’ve ever had for real action.
The New York State Association of Counties framed the issue of state mandates pretty dramatically late last year with a report that summarized the local property tax burden this way, “Individual counties have little control over the amount and use of these local taxes. In fact, 9 state mandates consume $4 billion or 90 percent of the $4.4 billion in property taxes collected statewide.” In other words, local leaders argue, our hands are tied (and our budgets are determined) by unfunded and underfunded state mandates. Point taken, and it’s emerging as a driving force in building the political momentum for the change that’s needed.
But there can’t be any let-up. That’s the underlying value of this first report. Its early reviews are weak, as they should be, but there’s no denying that it’s already sparked even more urgency for serving up more specific recommendations for a short- and long-term restructuring of the state-local relationship.
The new report is pretty straightforward about it: “The State relies on its municipalities and school districts to deliver vital services to its residents and often prescribes exactly how these services should be provided. This limits flexibility and increases costs…Although well-intentioned, the unwillingness of state government to give greater decision-making power and management flexibility to local governments drives up the costs of services.”
It’s perfectly clear that we must redefine the state-local partnership within the context of mandates. At its core, this issue stands for the era ahead – an era that demands smarter government, more cost-effective programs and services, fiscal accountability, and less reliance upon the local property taxpayer to foot the bill. Last week’s report, then, stands as the true opening of the discussion. Most importantly, it reinforces the critical point: It’s about property tax relief and mandate relief. You can’t achieve one without the other. We can differ on how to get there, but there’s no arguing that that’s where we’re headed. So the report is worthwhile reading for anyone closely following the issue, and it’s available online through my website, www.omara.nysenate.gov.
Photo in text: State Senator Tom O'Mara
Schuyler County Officials
Top row (from left): Dennis Fagan, Thomas Gifford, Doris Karius, Glenn Larison
Bottom row: Michael A. Yuhasz, Barbara Halpin, Phil Barnes, Stewart Field
Dennis Fagan, Tyrone 607-292-3687
Michael A. Yuhasz, 535-4967
Doris L. Karius, 546-5544
Barbara Halpin, 594-3683
Glenn R. Larison, 594-3385
Thomas M. Gifford, 535-9517
Phil Barnes, Watkins Glen 481-0482
Stewart Field, Watkins Glen 535-2335
County Clerk: Linda Compton, 535-8133
Sheriff: William Yessman, 535-8222
Undersheriff: Breck Spaulding, 535-8222
County Treasurer: Margaret Starbuck, 535-8181
District Attorney: Joseph Fazzary, 535-8383
State, Federal Officials for Schuyler County
Sen. Charles E. Schumer
United States Senate
Sen. Kirsten E. Gillibrand
United States Senate
State Senator Tom O'Mara -- Chemung, Schuyler, Steuben, Yates, western Tompkins, Enfield, Ithaca (Town and City), Newfield, Ulysses(Trumansburg)
Room 415, Legislative Office Building
Assemblyman Christopher Friend --
Chemung, Schuyler, Tioga
P.O. Box 365
Odessa, New York 14869